.

Thursday, December 20, 2018

'Nonsense in Alice in Wonderland Essay\r'

'Alice in Wonderland is a tale that ends with end, and violence lurks indoors all of its non backb matchless. through show up the book, Alice grows and matures, still ilk we do; however, all journeys must herald to a close and conclusion is eer at the end of the road. Carroll neither forestalls, nor denies the reallyities of death and loss in his book. If anything, he manifests the preponderance of its threat in e trulything. Instead Carroll soothes his readers for the pain and loss with non sensation-answers in excess of sense. He commands his readers to trust in some other logic beyond the rational and believe in precisely what we back non k now.\r\nIn wonderland, death is a present and probable outcome e precisewhere, and Alice is directly introduced to the possibility of it when she enters wonderland. After becoming bl ingest-up after eating a art object of cake, Alice became scargond of her sudden, large state. In the middle of her despair, she sees the White R abbit and calls for his help. He was blow out of the water by Alice, and dropped his fan before scurrying absent in fright. Alice became hot and steamed and began fanning herself; however, she realized that her fanning was causing her to shrink. She immediately, â€Å"dropped it hastily, just in condemnation to avoid shrinking away altogether.\r\n‘That WAS a narrow escape!’ verbalise Alice, a good deal panic-struck at the sudden change, simply very glad to find herself still in existence.” This â€Å"narrow escape(Carroll)” accentuates Alice’s childlike naivete upon entering Wonderland. She has never had to worry active dying, but now she is faced with it psyche on. Shortly after this near death experience, Alice is confronted with an individualism crisis prompted by an interrogation from a caterpillar.\r\nâ€Å"Who ARE you?” asks the Caterpillar, to which Alice replied, â€Å"Iâ€I simply know, sir, just at presentâ€at leas t I know who I WAS when I got up this morning, but I think I must hasten been changed several meters since then (Carroll).” Alice has but been in wonderland a short peak of sequence and already she has transformed in more ways than one. Her experiences beat do her question her previously stable identity because in Wonderland-nothing is as it seems.\r\nAs Alice ventures on into Wonderland and Looking Glass Land, death becomes in time more of a reality. The Queen of police wagon is one of the many obstacles Alice runs into in Wonderland, and, by far, the about threatening. The Queen ex statute titles, â€Å"OFF WITH THEIR HEADS,” in response to most situations. During the trial, the baron says the heart-to-heart must have a, â€Å"sentence startleâ€verdict afterwards,” to which Alice replies, â€Å"Stuff and nonsense! The subject of having the sentence first!”After refusing the queen’s order to be quiet, Alice is sentenced to a behead ing (Carroll). The theme of death is besides prevalent when Alice converses with the Mock tump over who is very aware that he will briefly be made into Mock Turtle Soup.\r\nThe Mock Turtle and the Gryphon pass along most of their time with Alice telling her nigh their school days. The subjects they studied are peculiar undersea parodies of real school subjects, just as the dance they perform for her, the Lobster Quadrille. This makes them real and relatable characters, one of which inevitably faces death. Alice realizes this and is careful when referring to lobster as â€Å"dinner,” which she nearly does several times (Carroll)`. In Looking Glass Land, Alice runs into Tweedledum and Tweedledee who tell her the theme of the Walrus and the Carpenter that lure the junior-grade oysters away from their bed by tempting them with a nice walk on the beach. The young, naïve oysters, willing for an adventure.\r\nDuring their walk on the beach, the Walrus says, â€Å"If youà ¢â‚¬â„¢re ready Oysters dear,/we post begin to feed.” â€Å"”But not on us!” the Oysters cried,/Turning a bittie blue,/After such kindness, that would be/A dismal thing to do!” The seahorse ended up eating all the oysters (Carroll 2). Although the oysters died in the end, they went on their adventure thinking that it was all innocent fun and games. Throughout these stories, Carroll invites us to believe in the nonsense. Although we may grow gaga, and we may die, we must not forget that child hood is the most important time because we have no preconceived notions of the world. Anything is possible if we believe it, and things have whatever meaning we give them.\r\nTime, in Wonderland, is of the mind. However, in the real world, time is more often than not perceived as a building blockâ€hours, minutes, and yearsâ€and senesce is time from a certain year. We accept that the time reflect on a quantify and our ages are one in the same. However, a clock may cycle endlessly, whereas we have whole one lifetime. Therefore, our age is simply our own fabrication. It is the product of an irreversible psychological sense of duration. Mad modiste says of Time, â€Å"Now, if you only unbroken on good terms with him, he’d do almost anything you care with the clock (Carroll).” In Wonderland, the aboveground belief of time as a reliable, motionless system does not hold.\r\nTime is stand for as a person, and is therefore sensitive to all the foibles and inconsistencies that plague actual humans. Defeating time thus changes from Alice’s normal aim of observing the regular intervals that time sets to go steady to the Hatter’s idea of a grudge against a personified time. Since time is now like a person, there is the inevitable danger that he will rise up and refuse to be dependable. It is yet another haphazard, changeable arti feature that has no claim to absolute validity in Wonderland. That is merel y what has happened in this Wonderland tea party: the Hatter says time â€Å"won’t do a thing I ask! It’s ever six o’clock now (Carroll)”; that is, it is always teatime.\r\nTherefore, time is frozen, and one of the most essential models of everyday human understanding are laughed out of reality. Through making time undistinguished to the goings on of daily life, Carroll intended to sidle up the subjectivity of age and time. So what if fourscore years old means death is on the doorstep? What is time and age but a means of measuring, and who ineluctably that? Even though growing old is inevitable, Carroll insists with the nonsense of the tea party that time does not have to go on. It can always be teatime. It can always be childhood where things do not have to have answers to make sense.\r\n in spite of the fact that Alice is growing and maturing, and despite the fact that death is an inevitable step in the process of life, Carroll wants to leave us wi th one thing: Believe in nonsense. His system was to imagine a dream-state in which the ordinary ways of logic were replaced by wild ones. Within the dream-logic, everything is consistent, but queer. That is the point-life in wonderland is nonsensical, but it is consistently nonsensical; therefore, the nonsense makes sense, so who is to say that the real world sense makes sense? Most importantly, we must call up the significance of childhood-no matter how old we get, for as long as one believes in nonsense, they will be happy no matter what ails them.\r\nBibliography\r\nCarroll, Lewis. Alice in Wonderland. Project Gutenbeg, 2008. Web. <http://www.gutenberg.org/files/11/11-h/11-h.htm>. (Carroll)\r\nCarroll, Lewis. Alice Through the Looking Glass. Project Gutenbeg, 1991. Web.\r\n<http://www.gutenberg.org/files/12/12-h/12-h.htm>. (Carroll 2)\r\n'

No comments:

Post a Comment