The Euro Scepticism In The Uk Politics Essay

The Euro Scepticism In The Uk Politics showUnited country, in addition known as the UK, is a s ein truth go fortheign bow consisted of England, Wales, Scotland and N differentn Ireland. The relationships between the UK and the europiuman magnetic north have still been complex. Indeed, UK has benefited from a unique(predicate) status in the EU. However, a recent poll showed that a volume of British people would agree for leaving the EU. How to explain that scepticism closely the European expansion? Firstly, we totallyow talk almost the historical belongings of UK in Europe since the end of World War II. Then, this will postulate us to develop the current affairs nigh the euro-scepticism in the UK. Eventually, we will conclude with the potential consequences of a British exit.Historical part afterwards the end of World War II, the nationalist sentiment was strengthened in the UK. Indeed, the UK was the only state which resisted against Nazism for oneness year. British p eople apothegm the red-hot European Union as a losers coalition. Moreover, a macroscopic consensus existed in the country and both, the labor troupe and the conservative party, agreed ab step to the fore this. Thats why, when the six pioneers (France, Belgium, Italia, Federal Republic of Germany, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands) first asked UK for joining the union in 1950, the labor party which was in power at the time, refused the offer in order to protect its coal and steel industries.During the fifties, pushd by the USA, UK changed its location and became in favor of a free trade ara. However, UK didnt want to a customs union and the agreement fell through.In 1961, at the alike(p) time as the Republic of Ireland and Denmark, the conservative prime Minister Macmillan unyielding to open some negotiations to enter the European Union. However, France through De Gaulle was opposed to this idea. He vetoed the entry for political authors such as the American influence over UK for example. So, two applications for membership were turned down in 1963 and 1967. The resignation of De Gaulle in 1969 will mark a fresh start for UK/EU relationships. by and by two unsuccessful applications for membership, Edward Heath who was Prime Minister took the United Kingdom into the European Community in 1973. The Labor party, led by Harold Wilson, was evidently against that choice and promised to hold a referendum to supply EU if they won the nigh elections in 1974. In 1975, after the rise to power of the Labor party, a referendum was held. Eventually, British people voted to stay in the European Community.On one hand, the Labor Party became even much inte stayed in Europe when some hearty issues were raised by European laws. On the otherwise hand, the Conservative Party gradually started turning against the idea of euro-integration, which accelerated with their new leader from 1975, Margargont Thatcher.Margaret Thatcher, who became Prime Minister in 1979, openl y expressed her very negative attitude towards the EEC. The period of her service was marked by an change magnitude political isolation of Britain from Europe. She was ardently against complete economic, political and social integration. She argued that Britain contributed a great deal more to the European budget than the other countries and she thought that something had to be do about it. In response, in 1984 Margaret Thatchers government negotiated a rebate on the British contribution, and thus received some of its money back. The main reason for this was the fact that a great share of the European budget is pass on the Common Agricultural Policy and since farming does not deliver a major sector in the UK economy, Britain felt that it benefited much less(prenominal) than other countries. Also, for Margaret Thatcher, Britain was losing its independence and sovereignty by transferring the power of decision-making to Brussels.During the nineties, Margaret Thatcher and her succe ssor prat major(ip) lead heavy negotiations about the European expansion. The conservative party feared to lose a part of the British identity and its countrys sovereignty. John major(ip) was often isolated with the European partners during the European negotiations. Moreover, a part of the British universe was becoming euro-sceptic and lobbied the government. As a result, the UK by John Major and his conservative government only accepted some parts of the Maastricht treaty in 1992. Indeed, they refused two essential points the social chapter (which will be sign in 1997 by the Tony Blair and his Labour government), and most of all, whizz currency. Besides, for example, UK (such as Ireland) has also negotiated opt-outs from the individuals area of free twistment called Shengen and continues to operate systematic border controls with other EU members. This is the whole of these particularities which make this so specific status of the UK in the Europe Union.The Current affairsSi nce the beginning of the year, the euro-scepticism in the UK has returned centre-stage. Indeed, a voice communication of David Cameron, UKs prime minister, and a recent poll opened the controversy about the UKs position in the European Union again.Although he ruled out the idea of a In/Out referendum in the 14th of January on the famous BBC, David Cameron, the conservative Prime Minister of UK, eventually announced that he wanted to give a simple choice between staying or leaving the EU. So if Cameron wins next election, there will probably be a referendum originally 2017. The Euro-sceptics, very numerous in the Conservative Party, welcomed this discussion as a result of a long campaign for a vote. More accurately, David Cameron wants to renegotiate the agreement with Brussels and the British relationship with EU in the first place giving British citizens the upright to choose.Against the criticism which deplored that the referendum doesnt take place now, Cameron said holding s uch a referendum now would be a false choice because Europe was set to change following the euro-zone crisis and it would be wrong to ask people whether to stay or go before we have had a chance to put the relationship right. The British Prime Minister lived on the edge towards his European partners. Besides, this statement caused a muss of reactions by the European political establishment. French foreign minister, Laurent Fabius, warned You cant do Europe a la carte to take an example which our British friends will understand imagine Europe is a football niner and you join, once youre in it you cant say Lets play rugby. His German copy pronounced that Germany wanted the UK to remain an active and constructive part of the European Union but cherry picking is not an option before adding that Europe needed more, not less, integration.This Prime Ministers statement occurs while the population is calling into question the influence of the EU. Indeed, a recent poll showed that a maj ority (50%) of British people would accept the UKs exit from EU. Only 33% are opposed to that idea when 17% prefer to abstain. According to other poll, a majority of British people agree the Camerons decision of referendum. However, some political specialists see the referendum decision as a political move against the UK independence party, which is a euro-sceptic populist political party. This nationalist referendum could discontinue the change magnitude popularity of the Conservatives adversary.The consequences of such a withdrawal would be direExportsThe European Union is easily Britains biggest single export market, with 53 per cent of goods purchased by European nations in 2011. This sector of British economy, directly and indirectly, supports three million jobs. Norway, Iceland and Switzerland already sell goods through a free-trade agreement. The difference would be that the UK would not be able to set the rules that govern the European single market. It would, of course, h ave to tool those rules to keep selling into those markets though. The argument sometimes deployed by the euroskepticts is that leaving would, somehow, encourage British manufacturers to concentrate on exporting to the likes of mainland China, Brazil and India.ImportsBritain also imports a great deal from other nations in the EU more than it exports, in fact. In 2011, they exported 159bn of goods to the EU and imported goods worth 202bn an annual trade deficit of 42bn. Their European partners argue that the UK need Europe more than Europe needs them. The problem is that the UK import a lot of European goods, not because they are doing the Europeans a favour, but because people want to buy things that cannot be produced in Britain think of all those German cars and French luxury goods.If Britain obdurate to leave the EU, the brass might decide to impose large tariffs on European imports, but this probably wouldnt prove very popular.ImmigrationIf Britain left the EU, the Gover nment would not be required to permit the free movement of all citizens of the 27 nations of the union into Britain, nor their right to pass away here. About EU 165,000 citizens migrated to the UK in the year to September 2011, after 182,000 arrived in the 12 months to September 2010. Immigrants are an economic benefit for Britain, filling holes in the labour market and boosting boilers suit productivity. solely the free movement of people is two-way. An estimated 748,010 Britons live or work in the European Union. Many have holiday homes in France and Spain. If Britain decided to restrict inflows of EU citizens to Britain, the European Union would be likely to reply in kind.BankingBritain is fighting a Financial Taxation Tax, which is much of the rest of Europe supports. British bankers, for their part, are generally in favour of staying in the EU. They fear that their access to lucrative European capital markets could be prevent if Britain left the bloc. And both banks and bus inesses calculate that Britains EU membership is in their interests because the EU can help to open foreign markets such as China up to them more effectively than the UK acting alone.PoliticsEurope is more social democratic than the UK. They feel Europe is helping to undermine Britains social and economic freedoms. Yet there are global politics to consider, too. The right wants to rely on Britains special relationship with the US, but Washington prefers Britain to work in closer partnership with the EU. Rising Asian giants such as India and China also seem to regard Britains membership of the EU as a good reason to build economic and diplomatic ties with us. evidenceTo sum up, opinion polls show that most Britons are in favour of leaving the European Union. Britain has long had ambivalent feelings towards the European beau monde it joined in 1973. They were sceptical about big projects like the single currency. At a summit of European leaders on declination 8th, David Cameron refu sed to agree to a fiscal compact designed to safeguard the euros future. But opponents argue that a medium-sized power like Britain can only exert international influence through the EU.